[nycphp-talk] MySQL Case Study - Stanford Graduate School ofBusiness (avail. at HBR Online)
Tim Gales
tgales at tgaconnect.com
Tue Mar 1 16:16:57 EST 2005
Mitch Pirtle writes:
> If the organization decides to commit to a particular
> database platform (for whatever reason), not using all of the
> features available to your advantage just makes no sense.
Well, it can turn out that major portions of your database
contain information, which is primarily read-only.
Even the niftiest stored procedure capabilities and
transactional rollback facilities cannot be implemented
in such a was as to use "all of the features available"
on read-only tables.
Being able to use compressed tables as well as (in) memory
tables in places and transaction-safe tables only where
you need them can be a decided advantage.
(as usual, it depends on what it is you are trying to do)
T. Gales & Associates
'Helping People Connect with Technology'
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.5.7 - Release Date: 3/1/2005
More information about the talk
mailing list