[nycphp-talk] OT - meta tags
tedd
tedd at sperling.com
Tue Apr 25 10:50:40 EDT 2006
> >The truth is, that meta-tags are not actually needed. As a test,
>not that one test is conclusive, I created a site that has a current
>PageRank of 5 without ANY meta-tags whatsoever and without even
>>submitting the site to a single search engine -- explain that.
>>
>>
>I'll try, but there are others on this list that are better versed in PR
>than I am.
>
>Page Rank is a reflection of backlink support. Get a few links from pr6
>pages that don't link to to many others, and you'll earn yourself a PR5.
>It has nothing to do with meta tags or even page content for that
>matter. Unfortunately, PageRank has little to do with your appearance in
>the results sets as well. It does seem to get spidered alot more,
>though, and it gives links on your pages more "authority". Hopefully,
>you know what to do with that authority (these days it seems the best
>use of a high PR is to sell links to less-knowledgable people who think
>it is important).
-=john:
My "question" was rhetorical -- I believe I know what PageRank
represents (link popularity). However admittedly, I do not know how
the algorithm works. I've read and tried to understand the
explanations provided by Larry Page et al, I get the general idea,
but the details are beyond me.
Okay, PageRank and meta-tags have nothing to do with each other
directly, but both are used in some fashion to determine SE placement
of a site, correct? So, in that manner, they are related. The
importance of that relationship is unknown by me -- your mileage may
vary.
As for meta-tags, I'm not disputing that the keywords and description
are not used, but I am suggesting that their importance is lessening.
I am also suggesting that several of the meta-tag types are simply
not of any value.
However, you have given me cause for me to re-think my stand
regarding the robot tag. As for my stand on meta-tags, I seldom think
of anything these days as being sound enough foundation to stand upon.
In any event, I shall comment on the remaining portion of your post
as soon as I can digest and investigate it. :-)
Thanks for the exchange.
tedd
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://sperling.com
More information about the talk
mailing list