[nycphp-talk] not including '.php' in URI
Ajai Khattri
ajai at bitblit.net
Mon Mar 20 14:47:28 EST 2006
inforequest wrote:
>
> haha never execute a tactic without a defined objective... if it has
> side effects that will come back to bite you ;-)
> (in other words, don't rock the boat doh!)
>
> What are the "added benefits" ?
>
> - you look more like a Web2.0 app
> - you make it easier for people who use search engines to find PHP
> materials (instead of .php files)
> - you make management wonder if you really are using java for web
> development like they think you should
> - you are more "search engine friendly" by the 2004 definition
>
> Seriously, how about:
>
> - you establish the potential for long-lived URLs that survive a change
> in technology (weak excuse, not likely, but theoretically ok)
> - you are slightly more search engine friendly
> - your URLs are slightly more user friendly, more likely to get
> remembered, bookmarked, etc.
> - friendlier URLs are more likely to get backlinks, and deep backlinks
> are more desireable than root backlinks
> - it leaves more room for innovation down the road (ties into the first
> reason on this list...long-lived URLs)
Noone wearing their sys admin hat today?
OTOH, making your web server parse all files as PHP will likely increase
the load...
More information about the talk
mailing list