[nycphp-talk] Successor to the Web?
Phil Duffy
phil at bearingasset.com
Fri Oct 20 13:15:43 EDT 2006
I would like to express my appreciation to those in the NYPHP community (I
counted 13 responses) who responded to my question about a potential
successor to the Web. It will take me a while to analyze these responses,
but the picture that was communicated was already useful to me.
I found the references provided by Dan Krook particularly useful for my
purposes:
Ajax and REST, Part 1: Advantages of the Ajax/REST architectural style for
immersive Web applications
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/web/library/wa-ajaxarch/
Some more information about REST principles:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Representational_State_Transfer
My goal was to check my development direction, to be sure that I had not
become too attached to my current set of development tools only to find that
serious successors were already emerging and the work I was doing would soon
become obsolete. My impression at this point is that my general direction
is reasonable, but requires some modification.
I should have described the application characteristics in more detail.
They must run over the Internet or a public equivalent. They must blend
content management with data management. Perhaps this is one of the reasons
that I seem to be encountering force-fits because as at least one
contributor to this discussion pointed out, the Web is stateless by design
intent.
If I have encountered some difficulties in dealing with statelessness for
the applications I am developing, it is not because of any difficulties I am
encountering in PHP. I am impressed with PHP, but it is not the whole
picture.
Again, many thanks for the contributions that were made to this discussion.
They have saved me a great deal of research effort.
Phil Duffy
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nyphp.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20061020/d49bdde2/attachment.html>
More information about the talk
mailing list