[nycphp-talk] capricious submission of forms
Chris Shiflett
shiflett at php.net
Wed Feb 14 14:08:15 EST 2007
Tedd Sperling wrote:
> > Can you explain what a screen reader would do with this?
> >
> > <h2>Please click the accessibility icon.</h2>
> > <object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" name="movie"
> > data="access.swf" style="width: 30px; height: 30px;">
> > <param name="movie" value="access.swf">
> > </object>
>
> No, I can't explain what a screen reader would do with it. However,
> if someone could explain to me what a screen-reader/user combination
> expects, then I probably can write the code.
Just to be clear, I wasn't trying to be facetious. I'm curious.
Many accessibility guidelines make a lot of sense to me when I'm looking
at the source. Simple things like labels give software a chance to
communicate important information:
<label for="email">Email</label> <input name="email"...
Visually, this association is easy, but it requires an extra step when
visual interpretation is not an option.
That's why it's not obvious to me how a user knows how to find the
accessibility icon in your example. That doesn't mean it's necessarily
broken; I just want to know for my own education.
> It seems that every time I come up with a CAPTCHA that is a bit more
> accessible, I have very vocal members of the accessibility movement
> telling me "Think about it!" without discussing what's wrong. It's
> as if CAPTCHA's are to be shot on site regardless. Maybe if we
> changed the name to something more politically correct.
It's the approach I'm not particularly fond of, not the name. The name's
clever enough. :-)
Chris
--
Chris Shiflett
http://shiflett.org/
More information about the talk
mailing list