NYCPHP Meetup

[Michael Novak]

Two words... Intellectual property.

They may have code but are not the architect.

-----Original Message-----
From: "Keith Casey" <mailinglists at caseysoftware.com>
To: "NYPHP Talk" <talk at lists.nyphp.org>
Sent: 1/11/2007 7:36 PM
Subject: Re: [nycphp-talk] Ownership of Code

On 1/11/07, inforequest <1j0lkq002 at sneakemail.com> wrote:
> Copyright is not ownership. One can "own" something yet not have the
> copyright(s). One can control the copyright(s) of something without
> owning it.

Correct.  You can own a book but not own the copyright.  You can
manage (have permission to create licenses for ) a copyright but not
own it.  My main point was demonstrating that ownership and usage are
two different things.

But you can never, never, never grant permissions 
[truncated by sender]