[nycphp-talk] Database, table, and column naming schemes
Russ Demarest
rsd at electronink.com
Sat Sep 12 22:40:54 EDT 2009
I think the definition would be in the services table.
The entity is a service, hosting or something. The columns in services
should define the entity (serivce).
So the service_id in account_services ties back to what the service is.
On Sep 12, 2009, at 10:27 PM, Matt Juszczak wrote:
>> account_services
>> account_service_id
>> account_id
>> service_id
>> start_date
>> end_date
>> ...
>>
>> So you have a one to many customers to accounts relation. You have
>> a one to many accounts to account_services and a one to many
>> services to account_services.
>
> Right, although there, I'd probably do it a different way, where
> services would be the listing of service and service_definition
> would be the definitions of services. That way, each record in
> "service" would have definition_id which would map to
> service_definition.id.
> _______________________________________________
> New York PHP User Group Community Talk Mailing List
> http://lists.nyphp.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
>
> http://www.nyphp.org/show_participation.php
More information about the talk
mailing list